![]() ![]() So obviously there is an issue with multicasting. That is 4 minutes longer than the 2950! If I run 3 concurrent unicast sessions, it takes all of them between 3.5 to 4 minutes. If we multicast off of this switch, the time is about 12.5 minutes. A single session takes a little over 3 minutes. Running two concurrent unicast or multicast sessions, well that is a different story. When using only 1 NIC, it takes about 8.5. ![]() ![]() We had two Intel Pro NICs teamed to get 200 MB/s and a typical multicast session was about 6.5 minutes. But at least the multicast portion was imaging with decent times. Multicasting on the 2950 was never an issue other than it was flooding the switch and making all the other ports unusable. For a long time we have been using a dying Cisco 2950 100/MB switch for imaging our computers using GhostCast. I am not a network person, but I am not sure our Network Team is qualified either. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |